Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Shrimpton"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
competing conspiracy theories -- | competing conspiracy theories -- | ||
can you be more accurate? do you need this phrase? I find it confusing as there is the question of which/whose conspiracy theories these are; "conspiracy theories" is one of those phrases like "terrorist" that needs to be understood in context. | can you be more accurate? do you need this phrase? I find it confusing as there is the question of which/whose conspiracy theories these are; "conspiracy theories" is one of those phrases like "terrorist" that needs to be understood in context. | ||
| − | [[Claire]] | + | [[User:Claire|Claire]] |
Revision as of 19:49, 30 September 2008
Para beginning The main sponsors of these vigilantes were --
do you have a source for the fact that these orgs were sponsors? Pls include a ref to this source.
competing conspiracy theories -- can you be more accurate? do you need this phrase? I find it confusing as there is the question of which/whose conspiracy theories these are; "conspiracy theories" is one of those phrases like "terrorist" that needs to be understood in context. Claire
I seen old Shrimpo on Sky news' round up of the press and thought I'd have a go — you'll prob. want to section off the summit stuff but i thought I'd keep going with it and bang down as much as poss while I'm in the mood: feel free to monkey around with it - its all a first draft as such
Looks good. REmember that links to new pages need link and not [link] which seems to affect thispage strangely?
--David 14:04, 5 December 2007 (GMT)
