Jonathan Jones

From Powerbase
Revision as of 10:27, 8 July 2010 by Claire Robinson (talk | contribs) (Promoting GM on BBC website)
Jump to: navigation, search

Prof Jonathan Jones is a Fellow of the Royal Society and senior scientist at the Sainsbury Laboratory of the John Innes Centre (JIC) (1988-present as at June 2010).[1]

Mendel Biotechnology

Jones is on the science advisory board of the Two Blades Foundation.[2] His biography on the Two Blades Foundation website says:

Dr. Jones has co-founded 2 companies; Mendel Biotechnology, founded in 1997 to carry out genomics experiments to discover and exploit key regulators of crop productivity, and Norfolk Plant Sciences Ltd, to combine health promoting traits and disease resistance traits in potato and tomato. Dr. Jones was elected a Professor at the University of East Anglia in 1997, a member of EMBO in 1998, and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society in 2003.[3]

As well as being a co-founder of Mendel Biotechnology, he is also on its advisory board.[4] Monsanto is an investor and collaborator in Mendel Biotechnology.[5] Monsanto's vice president, biotechnology, Stephen Padgette, is listed as being on the advisory board of Mendel Biotechnology in its Annual Report 2008.[6]

As at July 2010, Mendel had been granted over 20 biotechnology and GM patents, as listed on its website.[7] Its interests include developing "energy grasses" for biomass and biofuels.[8]

In its 2008 Annual Report it lists two lines of business that were central to its growth in that year:

  • a collaborative project with Monsanto on soybean yield, "the basis of which is a Mendel technology"[9]
  • the establishment of "the first-ever field trials of genetically diverse Miscanthus varieties for biomass production in the

United States"[10]

Career history

Jones has undertaken research at UC Berkeley.[11]

Since the late 1980s he has headed a lab within the Sainsbury Laboratory, using molecular biology and genetics to better understand plant disease resistance with a view to engineering disease resistance genes into crop plants. In 1998 Jones wrote, 'I've worked with transgenic plants for 15 years, in the US and the UK. The more I do it, the less I worry about it.'[12]

It was environmental concerns which, according to Prof Jones, led him into a career in plant biology as a source of high-tech solutions. He has written, 'It simply is appalling how rainforests are cut down, fisheries fished out and water resources are overutilized and polluted. But the solutions require more science, not less.'[13]

Attacking GM critics

Unusually for a biotechnologist, Jones has at times been willing to criticise the biotech industry, outside of the area of GM crops. He wrote to The Guardian to support George Monbiot's concern about Monsanto's genetically engineered cattle drug BST, 'George Monbiot and the Guardian have got wrong much of their coverage on GM foods and GM crops. But he is certainly right to highlight concern... about milk from cows treated with bovine somatotropin (BST). It appears suspect both on animal welfare and human health grounds'.[14]

However, his keenness to communicate the benefits of GM crops has led him to adopt a less tolerant attitude towards environmental critics of GM crops like George Monbiot. In fact, while the JIC's Director, Prof. Chris Lamb, has publicly expressed his concern at the 'polarisation of discussion about agriculture', and declared it part of the JIC's vision to seek to foster balanced debate, Jones has adopted an often highly aggressive tone in public meetings and in some of the material he has written for publication.

He attacks critics of GM crops at public meetings as 'self-serving' fundamentalists, calling them 'the green mujihadeen'. On the JIC website he has posted material complaining of 'George Monbiot's periodic eruptions of green bile on the subject of GM crops' and of 'George Monbiot and his bigoted, myopic, mystical, anti-scientific, organic farming business interest friends'.[15]

During the Pusztai crisis in February 1999 Jones penned an article at the request of Tony Blair's chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, on the benefits of GM crops. The government's spin doctors then tried to place the article in a national newspaper.[16] The material turned up 'partially summarized' in a Sunday Times editorial on 14 February 1999.[17] The following day the Daily Telegraph reported how the piece had been hawked around the press by Number 10. The fact that Jones worked for a laboratory founded and funded by Labour's Science Minister, Lord Sainsbury, who is a leading advocate of GM crops, attracted critical comment.

In the article, Jones wrote, 'Grandstanding does not resolve scientific questions', and he concluded, without any apparent sense of self-contradiction, 'The future benefits (for consumers and the environment) will be enormous [from GM] and the best is yet to come. In the meantime, let's have more information and less rhetoric.'[18]

Jones has also attacked GM critics for 'quite literally leading everyone up the garden path.'[19] But he has himself faced criticism for making baseless claims in support of GM crops.

At public talks, Jones has repeatedly claimed that GM crops have made aerial spraying of pesticides unnecessary in the US, resulting in 'crop dusters' going 'out of business because plants are so [pest] resistant, there's no business for applying insecticides indiscriminately from aeroplanes'.[20] However, according to a leading US agronomist, Dr Charles Benbrook, in an email to GMWatch, insecticide use in the US has actually been on the increase.[21] While crop dusters are indeed going out of business, says Benbrook, this is because 'fewer and fewer pesticides may be applied aerial, because of drift. Virtually all the new chemistry is incompatible with aerial application.' Dr Benbrook's conclusion on Jones' much repeated claim that crop dusters are going out of business because of GM crops: 'This fellow does not know what he is talking about.' So where did Jones get his data? He told GMWatch he read it in a newspaper[22] - The Christian Science Monitor.

Ironically, in his article about the media storm over Pusztai's research, Jones wrote, 'As a scientist myself I can only say "show me the data". Grandstanding does not resolve scientific questions.'[23]

Promoting GM on BBC website

In July 2010 the BBC website carried an article by Jones ("Fussy eaters - what's wrong with GM food?") promoting GM food as a solution to the world's food security issues.[24] In contrast with most reputable scientific journals, the BBC does not declare Jones's conflicting interests in writing the article, i.e. he has interests in Mendel Biotechnology (see above) and so stands to gain if GM is accepted in the UK and Europe.

In the article, Jones blithely dismisses the risks of GM foods:

In the early 80s, we did wonder about - in Rumfeldspeak - "unknown unknowns; the unknowns we didn't know we didn't know about", but 27 years later, nothing alarming has been seen.[25]

In this statement, Jones is wilfully ignoring the large and growing body of scientific evidence indicating risks and harm from GM food and feed.[26]

Jones also makes unjustifiable claims in the article for benefits of GM crops - "increased yield, decreased agrochemical use and reduced environmental impact of agriculture". In fact, independent research has discredited all these claims: GM crops have been found not to increase yields or decrease overall chemical use and neither have they reduced the environmental impact of agriculture.[27] The BBC seemingly has not asked Jones to provide evidence for his pro-GM claims. It is valid to ask if a critic of GM could get away with making similar unsubstantiated claims on the other side of the argument in a BBC news article.

Notes

  1. Jonathan Jones, The Sainsbury Laboratory website, acc 9 Jun 2010
  2. Science Advisory Board, Two Blades Foundation website, acc 7 Jul 2010
  3. Science Advisory Board, Two Blades Foundation website, acc 7 Jul 2010
  4. "Scientific Advisory Board", Mendel Biotechnology, accessed February 2009.
  5. "Monsanto, Mendel Biotechnology sign deal", St. Louis Business Journal, April 28 2008, accessed September 2009.
  6. Board of directors, Mendel Biotechnology Annual Report 2008, p 4, acc 8 Jul 2010
  7. Issued patents, Mendel Biotechnology website, acc 8 July 2010
  8. Mendel Biotechnology Annual Report 2008, p 4, acc 8 Jul 2010
  9. Mendel Biotechnology Annual Report 2008, p 4, acc 8 Jul 2010
  10. Mendel Biotechnology Annual Report 2008, p 4, acc 8 Jul 2010
  11. "Monsanto, Mendel Biotechnology sign deal", St. Louis Business Journal, April 28 2008, accessed September 2009.
  12. Jonathan Jones, Why I'm happy to `play God' with your food, Independent, 9 Jun 1998, acc 26 Jun 2010
  13. Jonathan Jones, Why I'm happy to `play God' with your food, Independent, 9 Jun 1998, acc 26 Jun 2010
  14. Jonathan Jones, Letter to the Guardian re BST Milk, Letter to The Guardian, 2000, version placed in web archive 21 Oct 2000, acc in web archive 26 Jun 2010
  15. Jonathan Jones, Georgie's porkies, JIC website, version placed in web archive 22 Jan 03, acc in web archive 26 Jun 2010
  16. Raymond Whitaker, Another emergency, another scientist, Independent, 29 Apr 2001, acc 26 Jun 2010
  17. Jonathan Jones, untitled article, 12 Feb 1999, version placed in web archive 12 Jul 2000, accessed in web archive 26 Jun 2010
  18. Jonathan Jones, untitled article, 12 Feb 1999, version placed in web archive 12 Jul 2000, accessed in web archive 26 Jun 2010
  19. From tape recording of a public meeting on GM crops, organised by South Norfolk District Council, at Easton College, Norfolk, on 7 March 2001
  20. Jonathan Jones, speaking at public talks, which were recorded.
  21. Benbrook made this specific point in an email to GMWatch. Some years later, in 2009, regarding the general use of pesticides as a whole on GM crops (pesticides being in this context a technical term that includes herbicides), Benbrook published an updated report based on official USDA data that concluded that while GM Bt maize was associated with a decrease in applied pesticides, this apparent benefit was wiped out by the increase in herbicide use on GM crops. The report concluded, "The basic finding is that compared to pesticide use in the absence of GE crops, farmers applied 318 million more pounds of pesticides over the last 13 years as a result of planting GE seeds. This difference represents an average increase of about 0.25 pound for each acre planted to a GE trait." (Benbrook, C. "Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use: The First Thirteen Years". The Organic Center, Nov 2009. Accessed 26 Jun 2010.) In addition, there is also the fact that GM Bt maize and cotton have built-in pesticides in every cell of the plant. If this means it is in some cases unnecessary to apply pesticides through spraying, it also means that the entire plant is a pesticide. Jones does not address these questions.
  22. Email from Jonathan Jones to GMWatch
  23. Jonathan Jones, untitled article, 12 Feb 1999, version placed in web archive 12 Jul 2000, accessed in web archive 26 Jun 2010
  24. Fussy eaters - what's wrong with GM food?, BBC News, 6 Jul 2010, acc 8 Jul 2010
  25. Fussy eaters - what's wrong with GM food?, BBC News, 6 Jul 2010, acc 8 Jul 2010
  26. For a summary of studies, see GM CROPS: research documenting the limitations, risks, and alternatives, GMWatch website, 29 June 2009, acc 8 July 2010
  27. For a summary of studies, see GM CROPS: research documenting the limitations, risks, and alternatives, GMWatch website, 29 June 2009, acc 8 July 2010