Globalisation:European Food Information Council: Nutritionists vs Food and Drinks Insustry

From Powerbase
Revision as of 16:06, 14 November 2010 by Melissa Jeffrey (talk | contribs) (New page: As the process of globalisation continues to expand it becomes ever more difficult to find the truth behind companies. EUFIC, for example markets itself as a non-profit organisation aimed ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

As the process of globalisation continues to expand it becomes ever more difficult to find the truth behind companies. EUFIC, for example markets itself as a non-profit organisation aimed at improving the eating habits and food information available in order to aid the general public in making the right choices when it comes to foods. It has become common knowledge as the awareness of healthy eating increases, that certain foods come under the category of healthy and ‘good’ for you, whilst others fall under the opposite category. As EUFIC wishes to promote healthy food it would be fair to expect that any funders to the company would come from such organisations. This however is not the case, instead EUFIC funders include, Nestle, Mars and McDonalds. It would seem then that EUFIC is facing somewhat of a contradiction, not only is EUFIC funded but labels associated with the more unhealthy foods, but these companies have also come under much criticism for an array of different controversies. This page will outline the advice given by dieticians and health advisors against the food that some companies sell which pose a great health risk. The examples used are example of companies which fund and have a relationship with EUFIC.

EUFIC is currently a member of the European Snacks Association, the 'only trade association dedicated to the advancement of the European savoury snacks industry' .[1]









Notes

  1. "European Snacks Association", Homepage , accessed 14 November 2010