Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • ...Prakash]] in circulating and encouraging the attacks on researchers David Quist and Ignacio Chapela and their paper on GM contamination of Mexican maize pu .... Prakash|C.S. Prakash]], played an important role in the attacks on David Quist and Ignacio Chapela after their scientific publication of GM maize contamin
    25 KB (3,523 words) - 16:31, 7 September 2009
  • ...nother joint statement criticising the dubious character of the attacks on Quist and Chapela, authors of the Mexican maize paper published in ''Nature''. Av Avery dismissed Quist and Chapela's peer-reviewed study as 'junkscience' and argued that the atta
    5 KB (750 words) - 12:28, 18 February 2009
  • David Ewing, writing in the [[http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4134 San ...aints that the study's science was sloppy. They also denounced Chapela and Quist as politically biased.' ([http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/americas
    8 KB (1,154 words) - 16:35, 7 September 2009
  • ...hapela and David Quist's paper (also published in Nature). Chapela and Quist's paper had shown GM contamination of indigenous Mexican maize, a concl
    3 KB (432 words) - 18:31, 25 March 2009
  • ...disowned the research of UC Berkeley scientists, Ignacio Chapela and David Quist, which it had earlier published. Their research had demonstrated the contam
    16 KB (2,400 words) - 18:04, 10 February 2009
  • ...lating to a commonly used viral promoter in GM crops, was funded by [[Lord David Sainsbury]]'s GM investment company [[Diatech]]. ...ence message board, widely circulated on the Internet, Wilson claimed that Quist and Chapela's paper on Mexican maize contamination, published in Nature, ha
    7 KB (1,029 words) - 14:10, 14 September 2009
  • ...or GM and, naturally, the Mexican maize would be negative, he thought. But Quist was wrong. For some reason, instead of the local maize being negative, it k Quist was visiting the region because his supervisor, Dr [[Ignacio Chapela]], who
    67 KB (10,560 words) - 19:03, 10 March 2013